Sunday, November 24, 2013

TPEP Principles - Removing the Soul of the Teacher


TPEP Core Principles

Quality teaching and leading is critically important.

Professional learning is a key  component of an effective       evaluation system.

Teaching and leading is work  done by a core team of           professionals.
 

Evaluation systems should reflect and address the career continuum.

An evaluation system should consider and balance “inputs or acts” with “outputs or results.”

Teacher and principal evaluation models should coexist within the complex relationship between district systems and negotiations. 

The above principles remind me of this scene from Dead Poet's SocietyThe 'Core Principle's come from the same stuff Mr. Keating has his students rip out. If you start believing this pap you'll lose your soul as a teacher. Can teaching be analyzed? Sure. Is quality teaching important? Of course. All of these 'principles' make some sort of sense and for the most part cannot be argued with. But if you're teaching solely for the purpose of attaining student growth data via these principles you have bought the introduction to poetry. And yet, that is what TPEP is forcing me to do. So please forgive me as I ignore Mr. Keating and begin analyzing down to a gnat's ass (as my Dad would say) my performance the 8 Criteria of Teaching.



I begin each year with an enormous 'To Do' list. I carry it around with me and add and subtract to it. It is filled mostly with mundane tasks, but occasionally contains creative things that I would like to try. When I first began teaching it was relatively easy to implement creativity in my classroom. Being creative was something you wanted to demonstrate during an observation. Just make sure your lesson followed the district format ITIP (Instructional Theories into Practice) and you were pretty much free to teach whatever you wanted. It was assumed that the teacher would teach the curriculum according to his or her professional opinion. My planning consisted of opening the teacher's edition, scanning the objectives, looking at the plans, and then deciding what to keep and what to throw away. I might focus on one aspect in say, a history lesson according to my personal strengths, background knowledge, and of course what areas I thought the students most needed, whereas another teacher would focus on a different parts for their own reasons. I was a sort of independent educational contractor who used the curriculum provided by the district to construct a lesson and one would hope a positive learning environment. Those days are gone for all teachers because we are no longer trusted to be professionals. I could write more about that and hope to. What I would really like to do is work on my messy to do list above, but RCW 28A.405.100 dictates I demonstrate my effectiveness at the 8 Criteria and their 67 underlings. So let's begin.


Teacher Evaluation Criteria (RCW 28A.405.100 (2)(b))


  1. Centering instruction on high expectations for student achievement.
  2. Demonstrating effective teaching practices.
  3. Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing strategies to address those needs.
  4. Providing clear and intentional focus on subject matter content and curriculum.
  5. Fostering and managing a safe, positive learning environment.
  6. Using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning.
  7. Communicating and collaborating with parents and the school community
  8. Exhibiting collaborative and collegial practices focused on improving instructional practice and student learning.

Criterion 1: Centering instruction on high expectations for student achievement & other mumbo jumbo

2b Establishing a Culture of Learning


This is mumbo jumbo by the very fact that the first sub-category of Criterion 1 is not 1a, but 2b. There was an explanation given for this, something about the different evaluation models didn't align properly so 2b made more sense than 1a. The amount of taxpayer dollars that paid for the salaries of the individuals while they debated this fine point in some committee could probably have purchased a new computer lab for an at-risk school. But enough! I decided I am Proficient (see certificate above which is not mine)  at establishing a culture of learning and below are the reasons and the evidences why:

High expectations for learning being the norm for most students.

The Proficient rating states in part: '...learning is valued by all, with high expectations for learning being the norm for most students'. I thought I would ask my students themselves. This poll was sent to all my 7th and 8th grade students. It would appear I have met the norm.

Classroom interactions support learning and hard work.
I think this exchange shows a support of learning and hard work. 

Sunday, November 17, 2013

Planning Conference Summary

So the planning conference didn't go quite how I expected, but went well enough. The questions below are apparently an official questionnaire one has to go through with TPEP. At least it is for the Danielson model. I'm sure it was probably included somewhere in some of the dozens of documents we're handed and expected to go through at the beginning of the school year. It would have been nice to have this all ready to go, but my supervisor was very flexible and we took what we would be doing as a class that day. My document states that the Planning Conference is optional if the below questions had been answered ahead of time, but I much benefited from going through them with my supervisor. 

PLANNING CONFERENCE

Questions for discussion: 

1. To which part of the curriculum does this lesson relate? 

2. How does this learning fit in the sequence of learning for this class? 
3. Briefly describe the students in this class, including those with special needs. 
4. What are your learning outcomes for this lesson? What do you want the students to understand? 
5. How will you engage the students in the learning? What will you do? What will the students do? Will the students work in groups, or individually, or as a large group? Provide any worksheets or other materials the students will be using. 
6. How will you differentiate instruction for different individuals or groups of students in the class? 
7. How and when will you know whether the students have learned what you intend? 
8. Is there anything that you would like me to specifically observe during the lesson? 
9. How and when will you know the students have learned what you intend?
10. Is there anything that you would like me to specifically observe during the lesson. 

TPEP Evaluation Forms and Procedures


This is a 62 page PDF from North Thurston's Public Schools, only 2 pages of which have anything to do with North Thurston. All the rest are I'm sure the same everywhere. I went to http://tpep-wa.org/ to try and find the original, or at least one associated with my own district, but quickly became numbed by the overwhelming amount of bloated government documents. Trying to remain apolitical in this blog, but all of this need for conformity just reminds me of the children's classic A Wrinkle in Time. Especially given the fact that the evil antagonist is a giant brain named IT. What a cool coincidence that IT is the initials for Information Technology and usually refers to a bunch of people dedicated to making sure our networked 'brains' are all the same and able to work together. But I digress. The dangers of  being a computer teacher with a K - 12 Reading endorsement, I guess. 


It would have been nice to have gone over the planning document in our PLC meetings, but we have only been able to meet twice this year due to the fact that my PLC is comprised of electives teachers, and some of us have been required to stay at our home schools to attend various meetings. Core teachers probably have more PLC meetings than they want. Over three per week now, I believe but I'm not sure. 

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Pre Observation Meeting 7:30 AM tomorrow

So this is what I'm going to share with my supervisor. We'll see how it dovetails into TPEP.

Doing the keyboarding goals because they're so easy to align with the student growth goals. Need easy and straightforward since this is the first year of doing this. Would like to expand next year, especially aligning Common Core Standards with STEM standards. That way, no matter what the software, since it changes so rapidly, the goals will still align.

I love Edmodo. Have been waiting for something like this a long time. Have long thought I'd like to upload some of my curriculum via some web platform, but nothing has been available. This will allow me to differentiate and there's so much available in the Edmodo Apps, I don't have to create the content. I can just monitor and adjust. It's great. Take a look:

Edmodo's Javascript App

Gamestar Mechanic's STEM connections.

Student Feedback

Thursday, November 7, 2013

In the beginning

there was a Has Been Satisfactory Box and Has Not Been Satisfactory Box.


 To determine which would be marked, the principal would visit your classroom twice a year for an observation. One formal and one informal. If the principal observed signs that the teacher had an active pulse and determined that students would likely leave the classroom physically unscathed, the teacher would receive a satisfactory rating. I can remember getting satisfactory ratings and thinking, 'That's it? I'm satisfactory?' So, yeah. The system needed some work. Apparently very serious work as one can tell from Governor Gregoire's very serious expression. 






But did it need this much serious work? 




I now have to find 67 instances of me performing my job in a Proficient or Distinguished manner. Oh, and there's Basic as well, except you hope not to find those, because too many in two consecutive years will cost you your job. This is what we were bluntly told at our August inservice. Go get 'em team!